As co-lead counsel, we represented consumers alleging Cablevision refused to provide consumers with cable services if they didn’t also agree to rent the defendant’s set-top boxes at inflated rates. We ultimately secured more than $70 million in settlement value for the class.
Marchese v. Cablevision (D.N.J.) Read More »
As class counsel, we represented a class of restaurants alleging that the nation’s largest chicken producers conspired to inflate prices. The settlement in this case provided for over $100 million in relief for the class.
In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation (N.D. Ill.) Read More »
As members of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, TCL represents a proposed class of online advertisers in this digital-advertising monopoly case.
In re Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation (S.D.N.Y.) Read More »
As class counsel in this action, our clients allege that the defendants conspired to fix the prices of various auto parts, and we helped recover more than $1 billion for a class of indirect purchasers who paid inflated prices for automotive components.
In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation (E.D. Mich.) Read More »
We represent a proposed class of archery-equipment purchasers alleging that the nation’s largest archery-equipment manufacturers and retailers conspired to fix prices.
Reznich v. Archery Trade Assoc. Inc. (D. Minn.) Read More »
We represent a proposed class of cities and towns that indirectly purchased the defendants’ “Fire Apparatuses,” e.g., firetrucks. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants’ conspired to artificially inflate the price of fire apparatuses, which has in turn forced municipalities to overpay for this essential equipment.
In re Fire Apparatus Antitrust Litigation (E.D. Wisc.) Read More »
In a recently settled case, we represented a class of consumers who used the Patriots mobile-phone application. Plaintiffs alleged that they had their privacy invaded when their personal-identifying information and watch histories were recorded and forwarded to third parties through the Anvato and Rover APIs.
Serra v. New England Patriots LLC. (D. Mass.) Read More »
As court-appointed executive-committee members, we represent a proposed class of Amazon Photos users seeking recovery from Amazon for allegedly violating Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act by using facial-recognition technology to improperly collect and utilize putative class members’ biometric data.
Hogan v. Amazon.com (W.D. Wash.) Read More »
T: 212.931.0704 | E: mhone@tcllaw.com Madeline Hone focuses on antitrust and consumer-protection class actions, and she has participated in the litigation of In re Effexor Antitrust Litigation (D.N.J.), Guthart v. Nassau County, et al. (N.Y. Sup. Ct.), and Government Employees Health Association v. Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (D. Md.). She conducts legal research, drafts memoranda, and
Madeline Hone, Associate Read More »
According to a recent investigation, U.S. retailers may have been conspiring to raise prices on archery equipment nationwide. If you have purchased archery equipment since the scheme allegedly began in January 2014 you may be entitled to compensation for the increased price you paid. Please fill out the form below and you may be contacted
Archery Investigation Read More »
