TCL recently settled a class action against the baby-food manufacturer, Gerber Products Co. The plaintiffs accused Gerber of falsely claiming that one of its infant formulas could reduce a child’s risk of developing allergies, and that Gerber used this false claim to inflate the formula’s price. TCL represented a class of New York and Florida […]
TCL Obtains Settlement for Class of Baby-Formula Purchasers Read More »
As co-lead counsel, TCL recently helped secure final settlement approval in an electronic-privacy case against the New England Patriots. In Sera v. New England Patriots LLC, 24-cv-40022 (D. Ma.), the plaintiff alleged that, whenever class members accessed video content on the Patriots app, the defendant would collect and then share the user’s personal identifying information—including
Patriots Settlement Receives Final Approval Read More »
TCL currently represents a class of end payors (for example, insurers) in a recently settled antitrust suit against the makers of Tracleer, a blockbuster heart medication. In that case—Government Employees Health Association v. Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., 18- cv-3560 (D. Md.)—the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants refused to provide Tracleer samples to generic-drug manufacturers. This in
Tracleer Settlement Receives Preliminary Approval Read More »
We represented and successfully resolved the claims of large structured-settlement annuitants who suffered cuts to their annuity payments as a result of their structured- settlement brokers’ alleged negligence.
Westrope v. Ringler (D. Or.) and Moore v. EPS Settlements Group (S.D. Fl.) Read More »
As co-lead counsel in Esslinger, we successfully negotiated a $23.5 million nationwide settlement for credit-card holders in a class action alleging that HSBC misrepresented and omitted material facts about the terms and conditions of its credit-protection product, and that HSBC charged class members for the product without their consent. In In re Bank of America,
As court-appointed class counsel in Casey, we were instrumental in negotiating a nationwide settlement that provided $110 million in benefits to a class of homeowners. The homeowners alleged that Citibank forced them to purchase wind, flood, and hazard insurance at inflated rates, and without disclosing that Citibank had a financial interest in placing the insurance.
Casey v. Citibank, N.A. (N.D.N.Y.) and Arnett v. Bank of America (D. Or.) Read More »
As co-lead counsel, we represented a class of New York and Florida parents who alleged that the defendant falsely claimed that its infant formula could reduce an infant’s risk of developing allergies. After defeating the defendant’s summary-judgment motion, this case settled on the eve of trial—the only case based on these allegations that obtained monetary
Hasemann v. Gerber (E.D.N.Y.) and Manemeit v. Gerber (E.D.N.Y.) Read More »
We represent a class in Suffolk County (and a proposed class in Nassau County) of vehicle owners who successfully argued that Nassau County and Suffolk County violated New York’s constitution by charging more for red-light-camera violations than state law allowed (in some instance, more than double the amount). As a result, both counties have stopped
As class counsel, we reached an agreement with Lenovo to resolve a class action alleging that Lenovo sold defective Flex 5 and Yoga 730 computers with computer displays that flickered, froze, or blacked out.
Gisairo v. Lenovo (D. Minn.) Read More »
We currently represent proposed classes of consumers in three states who allege the defendant was able to overcharge them for its air purifiers by falsely claiming that the purifiers were HEPA-grade. In Menter, we recently defeated the defendant’s motion to dismiss, as well as its motion to compel arbitration.
