Chen v. Vesync Corp. (N.D. Cal.), Menter v. Vesync Corp. (D. Mass.), and Tepper v. Vesync Corp. (S.D.N.Y.)

We currently represent proposed classes of consumers in three states who allege the defendant was able to overcharge them for its air purifiers by falsely claiming that the purifiers were HEPA-grade. In Menter, we recently defeated the defendant’s motion to dismiss, as well as its motion to compel arbitration.

Scroll to Top