We represent a class of consumers who purchased items through Amazon’s “Buy Box”, through which 90% of’s sales are made. Plaintiffs allege that Amazon violates the antitrust laws by tying a seller’s access to placement in Amazon’s Buy Box on the seller’s purchasing fulfillment services from Amazon. This arrangement allegedly eliminates competition in the […]

Hogan, et al v. (W.D. Wa.) Read More »

As class counsel, we represent end users seeking to recover damages for an alleged global conspiracy among computer parts manufacturers to fix prices of and allocate market shares for hard disk drive suspension assemblies. The court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and Plaintiffs are engaged in discovery.

In re Hard Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation Read More »

TCL was appointed to the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee representing a proposed class of farmers alleging that defendants — manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers of certain seeds and crop protection chemicals – conspired to raise and fix prices of those products. The defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaints are pending.

In re Crop Inputs Antitrust Litigation (E.D.Mo.) Read More »

We represent a proposed class of dental practices alleging that the defendant illegally monopolized the market for clear dental aligners by prohibiting dentists from orderingcheaper, competing aligners. The court has denied a motion to dismiss the complaint and we are actively involved in discovery.

Simon and Simon, PC v. Align Technology, Inc. (N.D.
Read More »

We represented Giant Eagle in a private individual settlement in antitrust action alleging that Visa, MasterCard and a number of their member banks conspired fix the price of interchange fees charged to the merchants who accepted those cards, and we successfully negotiated an individual settlement for Giant Eagle.

Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Visa USA Inc. (E.D.N.Y.) Read More »

Scroll to Top